Prairie View
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,846  Lucio Rosas SO 35:02
1,879  Dinaoli Adam FR 35:05
2,305  Abel Simie JR 35:43
2,537  Sorone Batiste JR 36:15
2,753  Errol Hampton SR 36:56
2,918  John Watkins JR 37:44
2,923  Garrison Stribling FR 37:46
3,187  Michael White SR 40:02
3,264  Adrain Davis SR 41:53
National Rank #249 of 311
South Central Region Rank #21 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 3.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lucio Rosas Dinaoli Adam Abel Simie Sorone Batiste Errol Hampton John Watkins Garrison Stribling Michael White Adrain Davis
TAMUCC Islander Splash 09/28 1369 35:20 35:00 35:47 36:52 36:38 38:29 38:55 41:06
Houston Baptist Invitational 10/12 1348 34:56 34:36 36:02 36:01 36:59 38:12 37:48 40:13 41:47
SWAC Championships 10/29 1358 34:56 35:41 35:29 36:06 37:19 36:53 37:06 40:00 43:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.1 703 0.2 0.8 2.4 6.7 17.3 28.5 37.2 5.1 1.3 0.3 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lucio Rosas 115.7
Dinaoli Adam 117.3
Abel Simie 138.3
Sorone Batiste 154.7
Errol Hampton 170.1
John Watkins 186.4
Garrison Stribling 187.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 0.2% 0.2 18
19 0.8% 0.8 19
20 2.4% 2.4 20
21 6.7% 6.7 21
22 17.3% 17.3 22
23 28.5% 28.5 23
24 37.2% 37.2 24
25 5.1% 5.1 25
26 1.3% 1.3 26
27 0.3% 0.3 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0